Leading the Charter School Movement in D.C. (Part 2 of 2)

 New Leaders for Better Thinking
In order to make charter schools work, the leadership would have to be fully functioning. Cultural competency would be an important piece toward achieving success, particularly in a city where over 90 percent of the students in the school system were African-American while less than 70 percent of the population was.

Retired general Julius Becton was the first superintendent under the new charter school plan. Although charter school enrollment rose dramatically during his 18-month tenure, he is given little credit for its success during that time. Part of the reason given is that his “military” form of leadership did not resonate to those who worked for him, and any increased support for charter schools was symbolic or occurred simply because the model was effective.

Other leaders met the superintendent position and burned out quickly. Arlene Ackerman and Paul Vance held short terms as head of the school system. Their ideology was different, as Ackerman was partially in favor of charter schools, but helped pass legislation to give more power to the schools, including charters. Under Ackerman, charter schools received access to more local government money, but also were held to a higher standard than previously. By comparison, Vance was less supportive toward the charter movement, and under his leadership, growth stagnated.

Yet, the charter movement continued to move forward, with support from Democrats and Republicans alike. New District mayor Anthony Williams was supportive, but so were members of the White House cabinet, now under the leadership of Republican president George W. Bush as the 21st century began.

In 2002, the legislation entitled No Child Left Behind (NCLB) was passed by Congress and signed by President Bush. Given the coarse requirements which would face school systems across America, many school leaders at the national and local levels became willing to look at alternative methods to help reach the stringent standards. The District of Columbia was ready to move forward with its development of new charter schools.

Only a year after the passing of NCLB, the D.C. School Choice Incentive Act was signed into law. Under the Act, $45 million was earmarked for transformational change within D.C schools, $15 million for charters and an additional $20 million toward a K-12 voucher program (2008). This act, also known as the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program, became the impetus which created dramatic change for charter schools in the nation’s capital. All that was needed was a transformational leader for the District schools, one who could handle the resistance toward the movement, as well as the cultural competency issues which would arise as students from the poorer, more predominantly African-American sections of town, began to seek new schools in other parts of the District.

Bring in the New Chancellor

In 2007, with a new mayor, Adrian Fenty, in place as head of the District, the timing was again right for the District to seek a leader who was prepared to make huge changes. In order to do this, the new head of D.C. schools would need more power to make change.

For the new mayor, this meant hiring a data-driven technocratic type of boss. Fenty was known as a data-focused decision maker (Risen, 2008) who cared less about politics and more about the end result. To this end, he named Michelle Rhee, at the time just 38 years old as the new chancellor of District schools. The power given to her was unprecedented, and she wasted no time in putting it to use. Serving directly under Mayor Fenty, and not to the school board, Rhee was given the power to fire central-office employees and educators, and within months of her hire, 98 office workers, 24 principals, 22 assistant principals, as well as approximately 250 teachers and 500 aides were terminated (2008).

The type of change which Rhee was looking for was a sweeping one. However, her leadership style was challenged, not because of its grandeur, but because Rhee was seen as an out of touch bureaucrat. This was noted by her Korean heritage and upper-middle-class suburban background. Her cultural awareness was challenged, because it did not match the majority of the racial and financial demographics of the District students.

In her short term as chancellor, Rhee did manage to prevail in making change, particularly with the charter schools, of which she was a supporter. This support may have helped, as many of the charter schools in the District have flourished while maintaining a diverse student body.

Putting the Lens on One School

One of the charter schools to flourish in the aftermath of the Rhee administration is E.L. Haynes Charter school, with two campuses in upper Northwest Washington. Founded in 2004 by Jennifer Niles, the school is a shining example of the potential growth with a well-run charter school. Last fall, Haynes opened its high school building to ninth graders and will add one grade per year until all four grades are represented. In all, the school serves 600 students, and accepted a thousand applications for the 100 open seats available for this school year.

In its first six years, the school earned national recognition for its student achievement gains, which included 80 percent of its students scoring proficient or advanced in math and 66 percent in reading (Joiner, 2010).

More remarkable is the ethnic makeup of its student body. According to ELL chair Michelle Rush, 45 percent of the Haynes students are African-American, 30 are Latino, 15 percent white and 10 percent Asian.

Two-thirds of the students qualify for free and reduced lunch, showing the working-class background of many of the parents. 15 languages are spoken by the Haynes students (2010).

The faculty at Haynes is well versed with conversations about race. As part of their training at the year-round school, teachers are required to attend a three-day seminar on The Race and Equity in Education Seminars (REES), sessions which involve the faculty and staff engaging in activities which address their own biases, and which of these are brought into the classroom. According to a quote from lower school principal Michelle Molitor, which was presented in a recent magazine article, “It gives dominant culture folks a safe environment to expose the things they don’t understand and to build allies and friendships (2010).”

Although there are lower performing charter schools in the District of Columbia, E.L. Haynes serves as a model example of how to build a successful charter school, one which the District school leaders can follow and use for other charter schools.


References
Foster, B.L. (2006). What’s going on in DC’s charter schools. Washingtonian, October 2006.

Joiner, L. L. (2010). Whatever it takes. The Crisis Magazine, Centennial Issue 2010. 17-22.

Ravitch, D. (2010). The Myth of Charter Schools. The New York Review of Books, 
        November 2010.

Risen, C. (2008). The Lightning Rod. The Atlantic Magazine, Nov. 2008.

Sullivan, M. D., Campbell, D. B., & Kisida, B. (2008). The muzzled dog that didn’t  
       bark: Charters and the behavioral response of D.C. public schools. University of Arkansas.
       Fayetteville.

Leading the Charter School Movement in D.C. (Part 1 of 2)


   This is the first of a two-part series looking at the history of charter schools in our nation's capital. 

The number of charter schools in the District of Columbia
has risen dramatically since the passing of the Public
Charter Schools Act  in 1996.
          The charter school movement in the District of Columbia has become one of the most noteworthy stories in the recent history of American public education. The school system in Washington, D.C. has shown the best and worst of leadership at all levels, as the District has been run by the Federal government, “home rule,” and a combination of the two.  As a system, the government of the District of Columbia is different than most other forms of city government, and this has led to many of its problems. However, the uniqueness of the District structure has also led to a great deal of the autonomy practiced by many of the recent leaders behind the school system in Washington, D.C., as well as the charter school movement. Despite criticism of the charter school model, educators such as Diane Ravitch agree with opinions, such as the ones expressed in the movie “Waiting for Superman” which support the movement of students from failing public schools to charters. (Ravitch, 2010)

History

          The public school system for the District of Columbia was founded in 1804 and originally chaired by President Thomas Jefferson. At its inception, the objective was for the District system to be a leader among school organizations. One example of this innovative style was the District forming the first secondary school for African-Americans, a feat which was accomplished before 1870 (Sullivan, Campbell, Kisida, 2008).

          In spite of its best efforts, there were cultural and sociological factors which complicated progress in the D.C. school system. Attempts to desegregate schools caused families to move to nearby suburbs in Maryland and Virginia, coining the term “white flight.” Enrollment in private schools in the District rose because of the racial friction in the public schools. The Civil Rights era saw an increase in violence within and outside of the District schools, culminating in the burning of buildings on and near the U Street corridor after the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King in 1968.

          By the 1970’s, the public school system in the District was disjointed. The student enrollment was over 90% African-American and reflected the poverty problem within the District borders (2008). By contrast, the African-American population of Washington was 70 percent.

          The events which followed over the next 35 years have led to the transition of a school system which by the end of the 2006-2007 academic year had almost 20,000 students enrolled in charter schools, while the public school student population in the District dropped from over 78,000 in 1996 to 52,191, a drop of almost 34 percent (2008).

Identifying the Problem and Finding Solutions

          The root cause of the problem with schools in the District of Columbia started with the influx of power given to individuals as “white flight” out of the District created opportunities for new leadership.

          One of the nuances of the D.C. school board was that until home rule was granted by Congress in 1973, it was the only elected body in Washington; therefore, a seat on the board became the path of choice for young black leaders in the District, who were aspiring for higher offices (Risen, 2008).

          Marion Barry was one of these leaders. In 1971, Barry seized his first opportunity to gain one of these public offices, winning a school board seat in a landslide victory.

          Almost immediately, Barry showed off his political prowess. He learned that the school system could help him gain traction in his political career, but could also serve as a tool to rebuild the black middle class within the District. Quickly, the future four-term mayor ascended to president of the Board, followed three years later by a seat on the city council, which had just become an elected position.

          Realizing that the Washington school system had thousands of well-paying jobs with city benefits, Barry correlated his climb up the political ranks with his use of patronage to those who helped him, mainly in the form of giving his aides and benefactors jobs within the D.C. school system, whether they were qualified for the positions or not.

          For Councilman Barry, the possibilities were limitless. His emergence as a leader in the city led to a new power base in Washington, one which was mostly comprised of teachers, but also one which exclusively included African-Americans. Juan Williams, a nationally renowned writer and television analyst was covering education issues for the Washington Post in the 1970’s, and was quoted as saying, “It’s no longer about educating the best and brightest of black Washington but about establishing the schools as a place where blacks can get better jobs, higher salaries, and more benefits (2008).”

The Barry Aftermath

          After Marion Barry’s terms as councilman, and later mayor, the District of Columbia school system found itself in turmoil. The organization had become bloated with bureaucrats, resistant to change, and unable to satisfy its main goal of educating the youths of Washington. In spite of spending the most money per student in the Metropolitan area, its marks were woefully low. Graduation rates and test scores were the poorest in the region while dropout rates soared. Radical change was going to be necessary for the public school system in the District of Columbia to survive.

Winds of Change

          In the mid-1990’s, a paradigm change in public policy began to show its way into the collective thinking of District legislators. Some of this was caused by the national elections in 1994, which saw a rush of Republicans, led by Newt Gingrich, take office with the promise of change. One legislator, Rep. Steve Gunderson, from Wisconsin, saw the education reform issue as worthwhile, and sought to create a charter school law, aided by a voucher program which would assist low-income students with public funding. (Sullivan et al, 2008). Despite some resistance, Congress did not take long to pass the School Reform Act in 1995. A year later, the District created and passed its own Public Charter Schools Act, one which allowed for the creation of ten charter schools per year. The stage was set; however, it would take several more years before progress was made, mostly due to problems with some of the city officials who had created the initial problems. One Washingtonian magazine article referred to the typical charter school as a “big laboratory.” (Foster, 2006)

Stereotypes and Prejudice: Their Automatic and Controlled Components


I was intrigued by the thought process toward prejudice exhibited behind the scenes in an article which I recently read. Generally, one would think of prejudice as a feeling, an emotion, something that is indescribable, but to quote a line once used by a legislator to describe pornography, something that “I know it when I see it.”

In her article, Patricia Devine, a professor at the University of Wisconsin, reflects on the results of three studies, which attempted to quantify the correlation between stereotypes and prejudice. Her analysis of the findings are worthy of further review.

To use the abstract as a foundation, the three studies tested basic assumptions derived from a theoretical model based on the dissociation of automatic and controlled processes involved in prejudice. The two dozen or so individuals were tested using an instrument aimed to identify high and low prejudice persons. After being identified, they were divided into two groups, but not made aware of why they were associated with their partners. In statistical terms, these were between-subjects studies.

The first study aimed to support the belief that high- and low- prejudice persons are equally knowledgeable of the cultural stereotype. The second examined the effects of the automatic stereotype activation and the third examined responses of both types while they performed a consciously directed thought-listing task.

Many of the responses were derived from activities which required split second responses. At first thought, my memory went back to the Harvard implicit tests I engaged in during Cultural Competency and Leadership class earlier this semester. The objective with the Harvard test was to make subjects select from between a choice of two words without having time to consciously construct their answer. Therefore, the snap response, or automatic reaction, is the chosen one.

I wrote of my disapproval toward the Harvard tests here, at least for the ones which I completed. In my mind, the best results will not always be found by repeating the same approach. Because Devine analyzed three different tests with different approaches, I was more impressed with her attempt to see the whole scenario from different angles before making an analysis. By quantifying the significant interactions, she could draw a score and set the level of statistical significance at < .05, which made her findings interesting to view (as a recent Statistics student!)

The findings don’t appear to be earth shattering in terms of statistical significance, but do support the theory that there is a correlation between the stereotypes of an individual and how they relate to one’s feeling about prejudice. As many studies on racism and prejudice tend to be qualitative and filled with data coded from many interviews and observations, I appreciate the effort that was made to quantify this hypothesis.


A Penn Relays Story - Running for the Love of Mom

The Perry brothers, Menchville track stars in the 1970's
and early 80's recently reunited to run the 4x400
in a Master's race at the Penn Relays as a tribute
ti their ailing mother.
On a terribly sad note, Mrs. Mary Perry passed away on May 22, 2012. I was not aware of her death before posting this. I do feel fortunate to have had the opportunity to tell this story while Mrs. Perry was with us.


Within the confines of the Newport News track and Menchville athletic Hall of Fames, the Perry brothers have built their own wing. Over the period from the mid-1970’s to early 1980’s, the brothers dominated local and state high school track and helped the Monarchs, under coach Steve Lewis (now with Hampton University), to three consecutive state titles from 1979-1981.

Each brother had his own niche. Clifton owned the middle distances, winning a state title in record time in the 880 in 1975, followed by a high school national record in the 600-yard run the following year, a record which still stands. James was a half-miler who competed on Menchville’s school record 4x880 yard relay. He also ran cross-country.

Eric was a three-time high and intermediate hurdles state champion who earned All-American status. Ray was also a state champion in the 330-yard intermediate hurdles. In all, the Perry’s built their legacy on excellence.
The Perry brothers, in uniform surrounding
their mother, Mary
It was a trait inherited from their mother Mary. Last November, the family gathered for Mary’s 80th birthday celebration. On that day, all of the Perry brothers celebrated their mother to the tune of the Intruders “I’ll Always Love My Mama,” while each brother (nine, in all) presented a single gold rose to their matriarch. It was a special day for Mary and her 14 children.

Just weeks later and three days after Christmas, Mary complained of stomach pain and was taken to the hospital emergency room. The doctors’ initial prognosis was confirmed and in early January of this year, Mary was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer, essentially a terminal condition.
Now in hospice care, the Perry’s all realize that their mother doesn’t have much time left on Earth. Still, her spirit continues to inspire.

Says Eric, “She is such a fighter. Her spirit is so strong as is her passion for love and passion for life.”
Now a detention officer in Texas, Eric wished to share one of the stories which best describes this passion.

“My mother has a favorite window at the home. Every day, there’s a squirrel that comes up to her window as if he knows she is going to be there. Mom even gave the squirrel a name… “Runner.” We like to say that the squirrel is sending nature to her window every day.”
Now in their 50’s, five of the brothers (Mike was added as an alternate runner) decided to bond and compete one more time in honor of their mother. For this moment, they turned back to their track background. Thinking of the prestigious Penn Relays meet in Philadelphia, they signed on to run, as a 1600-meter relay. Under the moniker “Sons of Mary,” the brothers entered the 50-and-older Masters race. Uniforms were designed and pictures were taken to commemorate the event.

Last Saturday, the brothers took to the track at Franklin Field, to relive their past glory in front of the 42,000 fans who commonly attend the last three days of the meet. Ray led off, followed by Eric, James and finally Clifton with the anchor leg. Their time of 4:15.13 was good enough for ninth place of 22 teams. But for the brothers, the placing and time were only a secondary matter.
Added Eric, “We wanted to have an opportunity, before the Lord calls her over, for our mother to see her sons together, focusing on one cause … one more lap.

And even though she was in Newport News at the time, on that sunny Friday in Philadelphia, Mary Perry’s presence was indeed alive, in the form of her five sons.


Heritage tennis coach voted PTR Member of Year

Heritage tennis coach Donald Widener speaks
at a USTA function
Heritage girls tennis coach Donald Widener was recently honored by the Professional Tennis Registry (PTR) as the Member of the Year for the state of Virginia.

Widener, now in his third year with the Hurricanes, was presented the award at the PTR International Tennis Symposium in Orlando, Florida this past February. As noted by the organization, the award is presented to a PTR member who has shown dedication and diligence in promoting tennis and PTR.

Widener is well known in local and national tennis circles. Along with his coaching duties at Heritage, he is also the Head of Player Development for An Achievable Dream Academy in Newport News. In this position, which he has held since 2004, he oversees the development of many United States Tennis Association (USTA) and National Junior Tennis and Learning (NJTL) student athletes.

The student athlete aspect of the position is an element that is not overlooked by Widener.

 “At the end of last semester, ADA had 11 students inducted into the National Honor Society. Five of them were tennis players.” He also points out that two of the five schools in Newport News which reached their Annual Yearly Progress (AYP) goals last year were Achievable Deam schools.

 With regard to the award, Widener said he was “honored” and added, “there is a lot of talent in the state… a lot of coaches doing great things.”

 The award is well deserved as Widener’s list of accomplishments is long and impressive. He is certified in all three PTR pathways – Junior Development, Adult Development and Performance, putting him in a rarefied class of coaches. He is also the primary coach with the Hampton Roads Competitive Training Center (CTC) for USTA, working with players from the ages of 8-10.

“As a group (USTA), we are looking at the younger pool. America used to dominate tennis in the 1960’s and 70’s but has fallen off a bit. Our objective is to identify these kids and work with them from a young age. It’s what the other countries are doing. We’re trying to find the next Grand Slam champion.” As an example, he speaks of Mya Byrd, an under-10 student of his from Norfolk who is already showing flashes of potential.

Widener’s work with USTA also includes serving as a board member with the Mid-Atlantic Section and Virginia District, as well as CTA President, and Junior Team Tennis Coordinator.  At the national level, he serves on the USTA’s Diversity Team and Junior Team Tennis Committees and was a national speaker at the 2009 USTA Community Development Workshop.

Other honors include a selection as the Virginia Community Outreach Person of the Year. Also , in 2007, he was named district Volunteer of the Year for Virginia.  His tennis program was spotlighted as a national NJTL Tennis Excellence Program at the 2009 US Open in Queens, New York during Arthur Ashe Kids Day.  

His tenure as head coach (he also served as an assistant for Eddie Bunch) at Heritage has also been short, but remarkable. Part of his success stems from the fact that Achievable Dream directly feeds its K-8 students into Heritage making his a “perfect situation.” His team is almost split in half between the “Dreamers” and “Non-Dreamers.” While this year is more about rebuilding, there are already stories of college scholarship athletes, most notably the brother/sister tandem of K’wanme and Sharmaine Tonkias, who are playing college tennis at Virginia State on a full scholarship. On a particular Friday, Widener took his team to Petersburg to watch the two freshmen compete.

For the team, it was a chance to see what their tennis career could become, led by the man who can help them get there.


Woodside's Brown Plays the Silent Beast

Having just submitted an article on some Phoebus (Hampton, VA) high school soccer players who have succeeded each other as the valedictorian or salutatorian of their class, I got to thinking about some other athletes I have covered this school year who will also be graduating next month. Here's a piece from the Newport News Town Square section of the Daily Press on Shaheem Brown from Woodside High. It was published in early March. We met at the Peninsula District wrestling championships and the most striking thing to me was Brown's tranquility. He was very quiet. On the phone weeks later, the personality came out a bit more. Good kid..and I wish him well in the future.

In a sport known for its fierceness and physicality, Woodside’s Shaheem Brown possesses an uncommon aura of silence. At the Peninsula District championship last month, a first glimpse of Brown found the senior in the bleachers at Phoebus High School, headphones on, in total silence.
In this case, he was getting ready for a semifinal match. However, a later meeting presented a relatively soft-spoken young man who chooses his words carefully.

When asked about his penchant for appearing to be quiet, yet intense, Brown’s answer was well constructed, and humorous.
“Everybody at school asks me all the time if I’m mad. But if you get me in a conversation, I won’t stop.”

Brown did note his change in appearance during competition.
“When it comes time for a match, I’m getting ready. Basically, I am thinking that I know what I have to do.”

This quiet intensity has made Brown one of the more accomplished grapplers in the Peninsula District. Last year, he was the district champion at the 171-pound division. In the recently completed season, Brown moved up the 182-pound class and found a tough opponent for the Peninsula final in the form of Hampton’s Chris Lee., who entered the match undefeated at 9-0. The match was close at 3-2 after the first period, but a pair of takedowns in the second gave Lee an 8-4 advantage, and he held the momentum for a 10-5 decision.
Brown went on to win two matches at the Eastern region meet, only to eventually fall in the double elimination competition. Still, his final season record was an impressive 21-7, giving him a 35-12 mark for the final two years with the Wolverines.

But his start with the sport started three years ago at another school. While attending Bruton as a ninth grader, Brown’s older brother Shamar had decided to try out for wrestling. Looking for an ally in the sport, he recruited Shaheem to try out.
So, your brother and you got to wrestle together for a few years?

“Well no,” said Brown. “He only wrestled one year. Broke his hand.”
Woodside wrestling coach Doug Camp has his own recollections of meeting Brown.

“Since the first time that he walked into our mat room he has stood out from the rest as a natural leader. Since taking over the wrestling program he is my first District Champion. Personally, his drive to become better at wrestling or whatever he puts his mind to is always evident. Watching this young man grow these past three seasons has been a pleasure, I know he's going to go far in life.”

Even after losing his brother as a teammate, the younger brother stuck it out and wrestled for all four years of high school. There might be an opportunity to extend his season as preliminary talks are in place to begin a Peninsula vs. Bay Rivers wrestling tournament at the conclusion of each season. While the intention is to begin this event soon, parts of the talks have included an attempt to start the meet this year.
Would Brown be interested in perhaps wrestling against Andrew Junio of Tabb?

‘I probably would not,” answered Brown, again wasting no time in getting to the point, but speaking of the match itself, not the opposition. But his reasoning makes perfect sense. “I messed up my leg after regionals. Actually, it had bothered me all season, but I must have done something else to it that day.”
But his career on the mat may not be over. Brown’s plans, to no surprise, are well defined. His outlook on wrestling mirrors the choices he is currently making in life.

“I like having competition. I am always trying to get better.” Quiet, but driven.
His choice of colleges has narrowed to the University of Maryland or the Florida Institute of Technology. A future stint with the Air National Guard waits. There may still be time for wrestling.

“I may go on to club wrestling. But, if I go to Maryland, I might try to make the team as a walk-on.”
With the dedication and preparation that he puts into every other aspect of his life, there is every reason to believe that if any wrestler could walk-on and compete for a nationally recognized program, it could be the quiet, determined young man from Woodside.


Lambert Defies Odds, Back on Beam

For Ashley Lambert, the hope is that her 2012 season in gymnastics will have a happier ending than 2011.

The level 10 gymnast with the World Class team was enjoying another successful season, with a state all-around title and regional crowns in the vault and floor exercises under her belt. A scholarship offer from a large Division I school in the SEC was on the table. Heading into May and one week before Junior Nationals, Lambert looked to have the world on a string.

In an instant, she almost lost it all.
Ashley Lambert's gymnastics
career almost ended abruptly
last year when she suffered
a broken neck.
Amazingly, she's back in
the sport.
Doing some less structured activity after practice one day, Lambert suffered a career-ending type of injury, one which left her with a C1 bone broken in two places as well as a broken C6 bone. To understand the seriousness of the injury, one only needs to know that 80 percent of individuals who break the C1 bone end up dead because the broken bone blocks the breathing passage which suffocates the victim. As a point of reference, actor Christopher Reeve became paralyzed after breaking his C1 bone when falling off his horse during an equestrian competition.

Amazingly, the Menchville junior was not aware of the seriousness of her condition and continued to practice. Mother Tonia came to pick her up, and as she recalls found her daughter “doing crunches and crying.” However, Ashley did not want to make World Class coaches Tami Harrison or Jon Angle aware of her pain. Later, at home, Tonia recalls spending 15 minutes trying to pop Ashley’s neck, thinking it was simply jammed. Looking back she now realizes, “I could have killed my child and didn’t even know it at the time.” But as soon as Ashley complained that her left eye had gone numb, the mother quickly knew what had occurred.
Says Tonia, “Right then, I knew it was neuro (related).” Four hours after leaving practice, the pair headed to the hospital emergency room.

After several hours in the waiting room, Tonia was approached by the doctor.
“He came to me and said, I have some good news and bad news. Which do you want to hear first?” Of course, she wanted to hear the good news first.

He said, “it is by the sheer grace of God that your kid is walking and talking. She only survived because of her sheer physical condition and her youth.”
Ashley recalls her time in the ER.

“They did an X-ray and didn’t really find anything specific. But when they looked at the results of the CAT scan, the doctors started freaking out.” She was quickly transported to Portsmouth Naval Hospital and fitted for a halo by the next morning.
For Lambert, the dream looked to be over. Gymnastics appeared to be a sport of the past, replaced by the halo to stabilize her neck and a lifetime of shattered dreams. Letters and get well wishes poured in from fellow gymnasts in every corner of the country. It was assumed that just getting Ashley back to normal activities would be the new goal.

But Ashley had larger aspirations. She missed not seeing her World Class teammates and friends at Menchville as she completed the school year with the homebound program. But after spending two-thirds of her 17 years in competitive gymnastics, Lambert was not ready to call it quits.
Recalls Tonia, “we had a conversation about it and she said, what else am I supposed to do?  I have been doing this my whole life.”

After almost two months in a halo, Ashley placed a video on her website, thanking her well-wishers. The most amazing feature of the 19-second clip was the bright smile displayed. The next day, the halo was removed.
Was there ever a concern about not competing again?

“Uh-huh.”  The biggest concern was that with junior year approaching, it was time to get back to the gym and make sure that she earned her athletic scholarship, her goal since beginning the sport at the age of six. The junior year of high school is usually the most crucial, particularly in gymnastics, as most of the scholarships for her class are awarded by the end of 11th grade.
So it was time to go back to work.

After six grueling months of training, averaging 30 hours a week in the gym, the young lady who escaped a life-threatening injury returned to competition in January. In only her second competition, Lambert placed second in two events and qualified for the level 10 regional meet, which will be held on April 21-22 in Allentown, PA. But the larger goal is to qualify for Junior Nationals, which will be held from May 10-13 in Hampton, VA. At this point, Ashley feels as though she is “just getting back to where I was last year.”
Is there anything to be learned from this experience? In a closing thought, Tonia notes her daughter’s new found appreciation for gymnastics, one which can only be gained by almost losing the ability to continue at it.

“I think that she finds herself working much harder now. For a long time, a lot of this was very easy for her.”
For more information about Ashley Lambert, visit her website at http://www.gym-style.com/ashley






For Black Male Athletes, No Fear = Huge Stigma

Several months ago, I ran a post about the Golden Saints, a youth league church football team in Newport News. It was a story about the team looking for a home field, something that all of the other teams in their Hampton Roads league had. Last night, Chaplain Deborah Mitchell of the World Outreach Center (the Knights sponsor) reported to me that the city of Newport News has given the team a field at Lee Hall Elementary to call their own! On top of this, IHOP (ihop.com) has volunteered to pay for the cost of installing lights at the field so the team can practice and play at night.

Today, I wish to turn to a more serious subject, that of false bravado....

At the beginning of March, I had the opportunity to cover the AAA state track meet for the Daily Press. During the course of the day, I encountered several other reporters, but spent most of the day seated next to Carl Little, who covers high school sports for the Washington Post. I was not aware of this information until the end of the meet, when we happened to be conversing with the same athlete. Actually, all I knew was his first name. But, as a lifelong reader of the Post, I told him that there would probably be an embarrassing moment when I returned home, because a cursory search of "Carl" and "Washington Post High School Sports" would make me realize exactly who he was.
After a poor game four years ago,
then Titans QB Vince Young
grabbed a gun and disappeared
in his car. For hours, his whereabouts
were unknown.
To no surprise, once I looked up All-Met sports (the Post’s online high school outlet) and matched the surname, I remembered that there was a reason why Little’s name stuck out in my mind. A deeper search helped me to understand why.
In 2008, Little authored a piece entitled “The Pain Beneath the Swagger,” for a website called The Root, which is found at http://www.theroot.com. As it turned out, I had recalled reading this article.

The first line reads:

“Black male bravado allows no room for a mental health crisis. What a sad and dangerous thing.”
Little’s piece goes on to tell the story of Vince Young. At the time, Young was a highly touted quarterback from Texas who was in the early stages of his career with the Tennessee Titans. While showing flashes of brilliance, the former Heisman Trophy winner was considered a disappointment, despite leading the Titans to a 17-11 record in the games Young started over his first two seasons. On September 7, 2008, Young was mightily booed in a winning effort. A sprained left knee simply added injury to insult.

The following day, Young told a psychiatrist that he wanted to quit football. He also shared thoughts of suicide. Later, Young grabbed a gun, exited his home unannounced and took off in his car. For over four hours the whereabouts of the 25-year-old were unknown. Eventually, he was found unharmed.
The huge response to the story forced a press conference from Young just three days later. While multitudes of sports media jocks and self-proclaimed “experts” had bandied about with their theories of Young’s condition, the quarterback was going to be allowed the opportunity to settle the record.

“I was never depressed,” proclaimed a self-assured Young.
What??

In a nutshell, Young was obeying the man law which was described by Little with the following four words – Black boys don’t cry.
After citing other examples of African-American athletes suffering from episodes of depression, Little brings home his point, and it is a valid one. His words speak much better than mine, so to quote:

“While there is much to appreciate about black masculinity, there are some insidious aspects to playing the part. For instance, many believe that we have to struggle alone with our demons and that asking for help makes us appear weak. That kind of individualism is a façade, and we do ourselves no good when we hold back the tears.”
Well put Carl. It was nice to meet you.

Yorktown's Prata Makes Name on the Mat

Original version of article printed in the Yorktown Town Square section of the Daily Press on March 30, 2012


Joey Prata collecting the hardware after winning
the Big Horn tournament
For a young man weighing only 93 pounds, Joey Prata packs a lot of weight.
The eighth grade wrestler, representing the Virginia Predators, has rightfully earned a name for himself on and off the mat. As a wrestler, Prata has compiled a record of 87-2 (with 30 pins) this season. His feats in the weight room have also drawn attention. In fact, a video of the 14-year old dead lifting 225 lbs. is currently making the rounds on YouTube and Facebook.
The sky looks to be the limit for the grappler from Yorktown.

With his middle school career reaching an end (his last tournament will be in Fargo, ND in July), Prata is looking ahead to the next step. Currently homeschooled, he will be attending York High next year. According to Joey, the family has already met Coach Todd Parrish and he is anxious to begin.
The start of high school competition should be a relief for the Prata family. Practicing with the Predators requires a 140 mile round trip to and from Chester, VA, a trek they make 4-5 times a week. But the effort has been worth it. According to his father Tony, “Coach (Mark) Strickland and his assistants have helped make Joey into a national champion.”

The first hurdle for his post-Predator career has already been set. Prata aims to be a multiple state champion. But the lightest competition weight at the high school level is 106 lbs. Even though 106 is the maximum weight, there is still a disadvantage to giving away as many as 12 pounds to an opponent in a sport as balanced as wrestling.
Two years ago, the family realized that Joey’s slight build might hinder his future wrestling career.

Enter D’Shawn Wright.
The trainer and owner of Body by D Gym in Yorktown has earned a reputation based on the pursuit of excellence mindset he instills in his students.  With many of his high school clients moving on to collegiate sports, the gym has become a focal point for young athletes looking to gain the extra edge needed to earn an athletic scholarship.

Father Tony, a Battalion Chief with the York County Fire Department, found Body by D two years ago while searching for his own workout spot.
Says mother Shannon, “We appreciated his (D’Shawn’s) intensity. The motto is “the harder, the better.”

Joey, who started his training regimen weighing about 75 pounds, didn’t take long to see the developing results.
“Everybody started noticing.” said Prata. “The difference was unbelievable and it was quick…within a month.”

Over the first year, Prata says that he gained “about 10 pounds.”
The improvement in strength and stamina has already paid dividends on the mat.

One of Prata’s trademarks with the Predators has been his ability to avenge a loss. Earlier in the season, he lost a 14-2 decision to a wrestler at the Super 32 match in North Carolina. Just six weeks later, at the Virginia Challenge Holiday Duals, Prata turned the tables and scored an 8-0 shutout over the same wrestler to win the championship.
The shutout was not unique to his performance at the Holiday Duals as Prata did not allow any of his ten opponents to score a point, a feat which is rare in a single match, but astronomically difficult to accomplish over the course of an entire tournament.

His intensity is not limited to the field of play. Prata is an honor student and currently takes advanced classes which will allow him to begin his academic work at York with four high school credits. A college career in wrestling awaits, possibly at Old Dominion or Virginia Tech, a school where he could showcase his “math whiz” skills.
Prata prefers the freestyle and Greco-Roman forms of wrestling. His favorite moves are the cradles, riding legs and sweep maneuvers. Now in his sixth year of wrestling, and second with the Predators, he enjoys the individual challenge of the sport. “I like that I get to compete against somebody my own size, an even matchup.” He also likes the team aspect of the sport, a by-product of his earlier athletic endeavors in soccer and lacrosse.

Is there anything else he enjoys about wrestling?
“After weigh-ins, we get to eat. I like the “food buzz.”

Learn more about Joey’s accomplishments with the Virginia Predators at www.vateampredator.com.

Wyllie's View of Friere's "Pedagogy of the Oppressed"


Paolo Friere, world renowned educator and
political activist of the mid 20th century
In 1968, Paolo Friere introduced political and educational scholars to his “Pedagogy of the Oppressed.” Friere, a Brazilian educator and political activist, published this work in Portugese, but it quickly found a worldwide audience and was translated into many languages.
Justin Wyllie, an essayist and blogger from England, has presented an in-depth critique to Friere’s most famous writing on his blog site at http://justinwyllie.net. His objective is show whether Friere’s beliefs are relevant in today’s society.

In its 19 pages, Wyllie breaks down Friere’s work into its four chapters. In short, they deal with 1) the oppressors and the oppressed, 2) the “banking” concept of education, 3) Friere’s theories as used in practice among the poor in South American schools, and 4) the contrast between the “antidialogical” and “dialogical” theories of cultural action.
Wyllie does a credible job of explaining Friere’s work. In his introduction, he notes the author’s model of dialectical materialism. In other words, this is the idea that human destiny is only resolved after a clash between two economic classes of owners and labo(u)rers, which are defined as people who sell their labor to capital.

This concept reminds me of a reading from freshman year in college entitled “Labor Capital and Monopoly: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century,” by Harry Braverman. Braverman was an American and a Socialist who shared some of the same political and social views as Friere. This book, written in the early 1970’s, had a great influence on my views between labor and management.
While Braverman focused on the difference between the “oppressor” and the “oppressed” in business, Friere aimed to separate the two with regard to social and educational issues, but uses economic class warfare as an analogy. In his essay, Wyllie aims to critique the views of the latter author. In essence, this is a review of a book review.

As such, Wyllie sees no use for Friere’s discussion of the economic class struggle in this book, but identifies the book as useful for social and educational issues, particularly in its discussion of “banking” education. In this age of “teaching to the test,” I find Friere’s views on “banking” education to be poignant. Metaphorically, banking is building up information, much in the way a piggy bank fills up loose change. In the same sense, our brains collect information, then use it when needed.
Contrary to Wyllie’s argument, I see the usefulness of the economic class discussion in Friere’s work; therefore, I disagree with the assumption that its inclusion in “Pedagogy” is useless. When describing two disparate groups, it is worthwhile to draw the parallel comparison to a “rich” versus “poor” struggle.

Otherwise, Wyllie gives a thorough breakdown of Friere’s book, chapter by chapter. For those who have not read “Pedagogy,” Wyllie’s essay is the next best thing.

My Mike Wallace Moment

Mike Wallace, of CBS News, and
"60 Minutes" fame, passed away
at the age of 93.
This has been a sad week for many in the broadcast media community with the passing of legendary newsman Mike Wallace. Wallace, mainly known for his work on CBS News “60 Minutes,” probably did not invent the confrontational interview, but he was the first well known journalist to use it effectively. His interviewing approach became so synonymous with his name that it was said the worst four words a person could hear were “Mike Wallace is here.”

Years ago, 1986 to be exact, I had the opportunity to see Wallace in action. In a stranger twist, it was my question to him that set things in motion and enabled those in attendance to witness his fiery side.

The event was a daylong conference on “The Future of American Business.” College business and finance students from all over the tri-state region were invited to the symposium, which was held at New York University’s Tisch Hall.

This was a high powered event. Co-sponsored by NYU’s Business and Public Administration School, there was no shortage of heavy hitters. President Gerald Ford delivered the luncheon remarks, his topic being “The Future of International Trade.” I have mentioned his appearance on this space previously for two reasons. First, I got to shake his hand when he entered the room, so my day was already made. Second, my battle to avoid going to the bathroom that afternoon fell short. It happens when you drink six cups of coffee to offset the mere 45 minutes of sleep the morning before. Unfortunately, it happened during Ford’s remarks, and I was stunned to find three Secret Service agents follow me all the way to the men’s room and back.

Arthur Levitt Jr. was also there to deliver a speech on “The Future of Entrepreneurship.” At the time he was the chairman of the American Stock Exchange, but would eventually become the longest tenured chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The chairpersons of PaineWebber and Monet Jewelers were also presenters. And of course, Mike Wallace was on hand to speak on the subject of “Media and the Business Community.”

The Home Group was the other co-sponsor of the event. In that year, Marshall Manley, a high powered New York attorney had been selected as the new chairman of the group, as well as its failing subsidiary, Home Insurance Company. Within one year of taking over, Manley brought the company from the ashes, turning a loss of more than $280 million into a gain of $230 million. Six years later, Manley sold the company for $1 billion and set up a new business called M82 Group, LLC, a private investment banking and consulting service. Not a bad decades worth of work.

I bring this point up because Manley served as the moderator that day, keeping the traffic moving and the panels on point. He must have served early notice because I remember Jeff Delutis, our group leader, requesting that I “not ask any questions.” The point was that there were panels in place to ask the questions and I was really there in the capacity of a college newspaper reporter and not a participant. Fine.

Anyhow, at 2:00 PM, Mike Wallace gets up to address his panel of five as well as an audience of several hundred. Honestly, I don’t remember much about his talk, except that it ended and that each member of the panel followed with a question.

But to my utter delight, the next statement got my immediate attention.
“We will now take questions from the members of the audience.”

Sorry Jeff.

I immediately threw my hand in the air and only had to wait for a couple of other questions to be recognized. Just like it was yesterday, I remember my question. It had to do with trusting the media, especially after the Janet Cooke episode. Since it has been a long time, let me reiterate. Janet Cooke was a reporter with the Washington Post, and in the mid-1980’s she wrote a series of pieces about a 9-year old crack addict living in the slums of Southeast DC. The shocking coverage won her a Pulitzer Prize. Only later, did the public learn that Cooke’s story was completely fabricated.

Wallace’s answer was forthright and direct. No, he couldn’t blame the public for losing trust in the media, and it was going to take them a long time to earn it back, and yes, they would have to EARN it.

So, thank you very much Mr. Wallace. I sat down, again satisfied with the events of the day.
Next question.

“Um. Mr. Wallace, what advice would you recommend to a college student who is aspiring to be a journalist?”
I could see Manley getting hot under the collar. The topic had been diverted.

“Mr. Wallace, I have a question about 60 Minutes…”

By now, Manley was incensed. He stood off and broke the questioner off at mid-sentence.

“Excuse me,” he began. This is supposed to be a forum about media and business. If your question is not about business, please do not ask it. I’m sure you understand Mr. Wallace.”
But the newsman wasn’t quite ready to finish. “Well, with all due respect Mr. Manley, I can’t imagine why you would think to invite me here and assume that no one would be asking me a question about my job. 60 Minutes is what I do for a living,” (roar from audience)

“I understand that Mr. Wallace. However, that is not our subject today, so again, if the audience members could just keep their questions to those dealing with business,” continued Manley.
Wallace replied with a smirk, “Well, I guess you consider this to be...your show” (louder roar)

My heart started racing. Oh my God...I got Mike Wallace into an argument!
<><> <><> <><>
Wallace, shown in the 1950's,
also hosted a variety show
for CBS.
This went on for a couple more verbal jabs before calmer heads prevailed. The panel ended and I bolted for the door. After all, was the day going to possibly get any better??? As I turned, I saw Jeff looking at me.

“That was awesome! Way to go.” Whew! Guess I wasn’t in trouble.


I waited in the hallway for a couple of minutes, and sure enough encountered Mike Wallace en route to getting his coat. In a fit of nervousness, I walked up to him and stuck my program in front of him.
“Mr. Wallace... I have admired your work for a long time. Great job today... Could you sign this?” Something like that, but surely as dopey.


He took the program to sign, looked at me with a knowing glance, and said “Thanks a lot.”
As he walked out into a waiting car (not a limo, more like a four-door K-car), I only hoped that he was really thanking me for putting a bit of excitement into what could have been a boring afternoon for him.

Rest in peace Mike Wallace, and thank YOU!