In a move that could change the face of college sports as we
know it, Johnny Manziel, the most recent winner of college football’s Heisman Trophy,
has started the process of trademarking his “Johnny Football” nickname, a maneuver
which would allow him the right to sue others who wish to make money off of his
wildly popular moniker.
And according to a recent ESPN article by Rick Reilly, this is
not something to be taken lightly. Reilly cites a study by Joyce Julius and
Associates which shows that Texas A&M earned $37 million in free publicity last
year from their redshirt freshman quarterback. This doesn’t count profit from
increased ticket sales and the millions in new alumni donations which suddenly
appear as soon as the home team makes it deep into the postseason and earns its
first Heisman in over 50 years.
It’s about time somebody figured out how to attack the leeches.
One of the worst kept secrets in sports is the allowance of the
NCAA and free enterprise system to fleece the college athlete. In college
sports, the T-shirt hucksters, EBay mongers and knick knack collectors are free
to earn a living selling items representing their favorite college players and
teams. Coaches and administrators enjoy six and seven figure contracts (even
the top assistants are pulling half a mil!), use of country club privileges and
school jets to work their recruiting magic. Each August, the video game makers
come out with the newest college football games, designed to include the most
current players. These games will net tens of millions of dollars for the folks
at EA, and other gaming companies. Universities also rake in millions of
dollars from these endeavors.
The players – eh, don’t do quite as well. Perhaps it doesn’t
bother the blue chippers who will end up becoming first round draft picks, as
they will make their millions of dollars. But a guy like Manziel is generously
listed at 6-foot-1 and appears more likely to follow the professional paths of other
Heisman winners such as Eric Crouch, Jason White and Troy Smith, more so than
an RG3, Cam Newton or Roger Staubach.
First of all, I don’t blame the universities for making every
cent they can. In fact, only less than twenty percent of the Division I BCS football
teams turn a profit. That money, plus the billions earned from college
basketball usually finds its way to also supporting the other sports in each
NCAA program, such as my beloved cross-country and track.
I have written on this subject in the past, and tried to forward
the idea that student athletes deserve a larger stipend as part of their
scholarship – meaning somewhere in the $500 per month range. The only problem
is that instituting such a rule would drive a deeper wedge between the haves
and the have nots. And then, who gets the increased stipend? With 100 players
on the football team, the tab already becomes about $500,000 per year. Granted,
that’s one offensive coordinator, but it’s also one sport. Do the basketball
players get denied? How about the fencers and the gymnasts?
Months ago, I heard of the idea of letting college athletes earn
the opportunity to market themselves, and think it’s brilliant. A booming tenor
at Texas A&M has the right to go out and make a record to sell, so why is a
guy like Manziel supposed to sit back while almost 2,000 items with his
likeness and name attached are up for sale by others on EBay?
The free enterprise system has to work on both ends. If the college
athletic fans can make money, why shouldn’t the athletes? Perhaps the starting
tailback at U. Mass has fewer earning opportunities than the one at USC, but
that’s what free enterprise is all about. And who knows, maybe the guy at
U.Mass breaks a 99-yard touchdown and enjoys his 15 minutes of fame on the “Today”
show. For the sake of reference, this morning, “Today” highlighted a 55-foot
buzzer beater which helped New Rochelle (NY) HS win a basketball playoff game.
This could be the fairest idea because it doesn’t pay college
athletes per se. It pays college celebrities. There is a difference.
Good luck to Manziel. I hope this starts a trend.
No comments:
Post a Comment